Search for: "State v. Weekly" Results 2101 - 2120 of 4,524
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 1:21 pm
Virginia Lawyers Weekly has a cover story this week about the new Virginia law with some odd new requirements on how to notarize documents. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)Affirming dismissal of White cops' 2003 race/layoff claims based on a 1973 Consent DecreeFantini v Salem State College, No. 07-2026 (1st Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
" The subsequent turf wars over who paid for destitute asylum seekers arguably included such cases as Westminster CC v NASS [2002] 1 WLR 2956, [2002] UKHL 38, W v Croydon, A v Hackney [2007] 1 WLR 3168, [2007] EWCA Civ 266, R v Wandsworth LBC ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539, R (Mani) v Lambeth LBC [2002] EWCA Civ 836, and, of course, M v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) and R (Zarzour) v LB of Hillingdon [2009] EWCA Civ 1529. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
Finally, a federal district ruled in the same case that the franchisor violated the Massachusetts workers’ compensation law and Wage Act by improperly requiring the franchisee-employee to pay for insurance and by failing to pay the franchisee-employee within a week of the weekly or bi-weekly pay period during which the wages were earned (Awuah v. [read post]