Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 2101 - 2120 of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” He had been a highly respected federal judge, and the author of an important antitrust, antimonopoly opinion, Addyston Pipe and Steel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:59 am by Joost Pauwelyn
  It may broaden violations (especially in the investment context) by comparing products/investors that do not really compete (in Occidental, exporters of oil v. exporters of flowers) but present the same regulatory concerns. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:40 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  Meanwhile, Reuters News Service reports a New York Appeals Court has voted to revive a lawsuit against a coke oven manufacturer, which alleges Honeywell’s industrial steel ovens contributed to cancer diagnoses among steel workers. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
Everyone seems to agree that was improper, but Judge Ural Glanville still held defence counsel Brian Steel in contempt for refusing to share how he discovered the meeting. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm by Simon Lester
The WTO Appellate Body in US-Zeroing (EC), US-Zeroing (Japan), US-Stainless Steel (Mexico), US-Continued Zeroing (EC) found denial of offsets for non-dumped comparisons in antidumping duty administrative reviews to be inconsistent with Article 9.3 of the Antidumping Agreement and Article VI:2 of the GATT 1994, either ``as such,'' or ``as applied'' in certain administrative reviews, or both.\6\ In US-Zeroing (Japan), the WTO Appellate Body also found denial of… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 6:31 am by Don Asher
It is rare to find an industry in our part of the country that does not need powered machines in some capacity: from our ports, our air and train transportation, our automotive industry, to our steel mills, our farming operations, our construction projects, and commercial trucking, they are commonplace. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Malcolm Birdling
Even then “that right may be restricted by the need to fulfil the legitimate expectations of a beneficiary of the measure, who has been led to rely on the lawfulness thereof”: Case C-365/89 Cargill v Produktschap voor Margarine, Vetten en Oliën paragraph 18, citing Case 14/81 Alpha Steel v Commission. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Steel & Anor v NRAM PLC (Scotland), heard 7 Nov 2017. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Metinvest also owns the embattled steel plant in Mariupol. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
Less well noticed was a curious procedural feature of the second case, Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:20 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 252.4 The Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals addressed a claim brought under the ORFA in Steele v. [read post]