Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 2101 - 2120 of 20,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 7:24 pm by Marcia McShane
  Today’s unanimous Supreme Court opinion in CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:48 pm by justia
The Court first allowed same-day access to audio of oral arguments a decade ago in Bush v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am by Madelaine Lane
On November 30, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court reinstated, Duncan v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
M & S also operates a flower delivery service via its website which enables orders to be placed online.The High Court did not grant an interim injunction and, as so many other national courts before, Mr Justice Arnold decided to refer the "Adword" matter to the European Court of Justice.While the actual questions are still outstanding, (para 104 "I think it is right that the parties should have the opportunity to consider my… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
For instance, the landmark case governing the reporting restrictions on NSL cases, Chow Hang Tung v Secretary for Justice, the judgment is still publicly accessible through the official Judiciary website and Hong Kong Legal Information Institutes run by the HKU Faculty of Law. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
" Keeping this in mind, I still wish for 2016 to bring closure for Florida on some of these important issues. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
The latest (v. 35 no. 2) issue of the Journal of Supreme Court History has another article on Justice Harlan, albeit one in a very light vein. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Court subsequently looked to the 2008 Honda v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
The IPKat has heard from his friends at international IP firm Howrey that earlier this month in Sisvel v Sosecal, the President of the District Court of The Hague ruled confirmed that, notwithstanding that unhelpful ruling of the European Court of Justice in Case C-281/05, Montex Holdings Ltd v Diesel SpA (noted in "Diesel can't strip Montex of its trousers", here, by the IPKat), you can still seize transit goods in the Netherlands… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Still, the Court does not require a lack of relevant expertise to trigger the major questions doctrine. [read post]