Search for: "Strickland"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
Strickland ((07-689), but found the inquiry confusing, frustrating and inconclusive. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
At its Conference on June 12, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the justiciability of claims against a private battlefield support contractor in an active war zone, equitable tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and a court’s authority to order a foreign sovereign to pay defaulted debt. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the standard in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Strickland, I think proponents of Section 5 can be comforted that he is not likely to strike the Act down in the Texas Redistricting Cases (especially given that the question was not adjudicated below, although, of course, that did not stop the Court in Citizens United). [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
Ted Strickland halted the execution. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
Strickland, No. 07-3600 A provision of Ohio Rev. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
ColsonDocket: 11-981Issue(s): Whether the prejudice arising from multiple errors committed by defense counsel should be considered cumulatively for purposes of deciding whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 10:41 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm
Strickland, 346 N.C. 443, 445–46 (1997) (finding such evidence inadmissible in support of defense that court characterized as accident defense). [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Ted Strickland Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0369p.06 2008/10/10 Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:19 am
Strickland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Meanwhile, Montana argued that “speculative” concerns like possible rehabilitation programs and “anxiety” ought not count; and the federal government argued that the familiar “prejudice” standard from Strickland and Bagley ought to apply: a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different (but only that it “puts the outcome in a different light,” not “that he would have received a different sentence”). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In his dissenting opinion, Judge Kelly noted that even if trial counsel’s performance failed to meet the prevailing professional norms, he failed to meet the second prong of Strickland test. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
Judge Stan Strickland: Since we have referenced the rumors about the money to come … Baez: Apparently there is some rumor that was being spread that apparently I’m supposed to get $700,000 at trial. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:13 am
PD needed to establish the two-prong test in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
