Search for: "Terrible v. Terrible" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2021, 6:53 am by Tobias Lutzi
Still, Adrian Briggs has managed to maintain a busy barrister practice in London (including well-known cases such as Case C-68/93 Fiona Shevill, Rubin v Eurofinance [2012] UKSC 46, and The Alexandros T [2013] UKSC 70) while also remaining an active member of the academic community regularly contributing not only to parliamentary committees but also, on occasion, to the academic discussion on this blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:53 am by Meg
Non-CP provisions of those laws will remain with the other agencies Draft CFPB Org Chart - Some interesting choices made in where things placed Chart includes targeted individuals groups - servicemembers, elderly, and students [having dealt with terrible service from one of my lenders, I'm glad to see this group included] are under education, but could have been put in enforcement too Also notable: central placement of research--in most agencies this function is shunted way off to the… [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:47 pm
This is a version of the argument from United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm by JP
  We are not speaking of the POLL tax, or the requirement of a fee to vote in elections, the Jim Crow-era attempts by some states to prevent minority groups from exercising their new 15th Amendment given right, which existed nationwide in federal elections until the 24th Amendment was ratified, and what took the  Harper v. [read post]
The court was also unpersuaded by the university’s free association argument, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 9:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It is a terrible crime, and the victims deserve justice. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:01 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
  Además lo catalogó como “una herramienta para acallar voces”, mientras recalcó que quienes sean víctimas de este tipo de actos difamatorias, pueden acudir al tribunal a reclamar una indemnización. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:00 am by Jeff Welty
This Atlantic article highlights Wolfe v. [read post]