Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 2101 - 2120 of 49,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm by Unknown
Hudson Insurance Company (Insurance; Tort Law) One case was decided on 6/25/21:Yellen v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Clear labelling of incentivised posts is required under UK consumer protection law, so that people are not misled. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am by Andrew Hamm
” “Courts must ensure reasons given for classifications are not a mere excuse to disadvantage one class of people,” she continued, and “there is no fit” between Michigan’s stated aim – the protection of women – and the realities of this law. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information Law Reese v Daines, 20 Misc 3d 1145(A) Justice NeMoyer’s ruling in the Reese case provides summaries of the basic issues and case law involved in satisfying the mandates of New York’s Open Meetings Law (OML) (Public Officers Law § 100 et seq) and its Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), Public Officers Law Section 84 et. seq. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published  its Per Curiam  Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Michael Risch
It's been about two years, so I guess it was about time to write about Oracle v. [read post]