Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Smith"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 3,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm
For example, if a trust owns a home and the trustee is John Smith, title to the property would be held, loosely stated, as "John Smith, trustee of the Smith Trust. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
Kovich v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdiction Australia The trial of the Ben Roberts-Smith libel claim against various newspapers has begun. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The ruling will have an effect on people trying to use takedowns to censor speech, and the court flags this as a problem. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
(Ratzlaf v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
Jack Smith took the position that the President isn’t immune to anything, and the Trump people took the position that the president’s immune from everything. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:17 am
Palmore v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Smith, Karolyne Garner, for Terry Carter, Respondent. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
One of those cases, Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Smith: Reinstates right to effective counsel in capital cases when counsel does not present mitigating evidence during the sentencing phase. 2009 Montejo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Smith trips but is unharmed; however he is delayed by the stumble and therefore steps outside just as a gargoyle detaches from the building and falls on him. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority in Smith, the First Amendment has never been a license to be a law unto oneself. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:35 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
