Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 2101 - 2120 of 8,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 11:29 am by Stanley Radtke
The question certified for review is: Whether a lawful permanent resident who was convicted by guilty plea of an offense that renders him deportable and excludable under differently phrased statutory subsections, but who did not depart and reenter the United States between his conviction and the commencement of removal proceedings, is categorically foreclosed from seeking discretionary relief from removal under former Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:36 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Under the AUMF the government was required to prove both that Suleiman was a member of the Taliban and that he engaged in, or purposefully and materially supported, hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; the government did not meet this burden. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Article III of the United States Constitution “limits Federal Court jurisdiction to ‘cases’ and ‘controversies. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:39 pm
We find that the petitioners have presented substantial information indicating that the northern leopard frogs in the western United States may be genetically discrete from northern leopard frogs in the eastern United States and that the western U.S. population may also be significant to the species as a whole as the loss of this potentially discrete population segment may result in a significant gap in the range of the species. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Amy Howe
  Instead, they issue an order “invit[ing] the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States” – also known as a “CVSG,” for “call for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:31 pm by admin
An individual who is present in the United States illegally for over 180 days but less than 1 year is barred from returning to the United States after departure for 3 years. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:31 pm by admin
An individual who is present in the United States illegally for over 180 days but less than 1 year is barred from returning to the United States after departure for 3 years. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 4:31 pm by admin
An individual who is present in the United States illegally for over 180 days but less than 1 year is barred from returning to the United States after departure for 3 years. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:54 pm by Jon Katz
Whenever a non-United States citizen is charged with a crime, it is important for that criminal defendant’s lawyer to address with the client the risks that a conviction might pose for adjustment of immigration status and applications for other immigration relief, possible deportation, and possible exclusion from the United States. [read post]
18 May 2019, 10:46 am by Mark D. Harley
Yesterday, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the agency has completed data entry for all fiscal year 2020 H-1B cap-subject petitions selected in the lottery. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:15 am
., concurring in judgment SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07-5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:31 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 16-1344 Issue: Whether a person who obtains an account holder’s permission to access a computer nevertheless “accesses a computer without authorization” in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act when he acts without permission from the computer’s owner. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:13 am
Via Scotusblog, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Rothgery v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
United States 16-237 Issue: (1) Whether a district court commits plain error by enhancing a sentence based on a divisible statute without requiring the government to meet its burden of proving that the conviction arose under a qualifying prong of that statute, as five Circuits have held, or whether on plain-error review the burden instead shifts to the defendant to affirmatively show that the alleged predicate offense did not arise under a qualifying prong of the… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:13 pm
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently issued a final rule in the Federal Register amending various aspects of the religious workers program. [read post]