Search for: "US v. London" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
 Recent PatLit pieces review Unwired Planet v Huawei (FRAND and competition law issues held unsuitable for summary judgment) and the award of this year's Prix de thèse Véron & Associés. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
Eleonora raised that a useful reform would be one for private copying, and wondered whether there is still a need to distinguish between primary and secondary legislation distinction. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am by Keith Mallinson
I was a speaker last week at the Patents in Telecoms & the Internet of Things conference in London. [read post]
9 May 2025, 11:14 am by Scott Bomboy
New London (2005), which held that a city’s taking of private property to sell for private development qualified as a “public use” within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause; and McCreary County vs. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm by Giles Peaker
CT v Horsham District Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 617 (AAC) This was an appeal to the Upper Tribunal from the benefits First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
For example, if a publication reports that the Panama Papers reveal that a cousin of a well-known foreign dictator has been using an offshore company to purchase properties in London the potential imputation is that the individual has been doing this on behalf of the dictator. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am by INFORRM
First and foremost, in Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45; [2002] Fam 261 the Court of Appeal made clear that parties to financial remedy proceedings owe an undertaking to the court not to use information disclosed by the other party under compulsion for any purpose other than the proper purposes of the proceedings, and it is a breach of that undertaking and a contempt of court for a party to publish such information. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Nijmegen, The Netherlands : Published for the Global Law Association by Wolf Legal Publishers, 2011 JZ 5625 A76 2011 V.2 Arms control. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
After four days of vote-counting, CNN was first to call the election in Biden’s favour at 11.24am Eastern US time. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:56 am by Giles Peaker
Following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Waaler v. [read post]