Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Mr Jones has offered the undertaking. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
The Stanford Law Review has an interesting series of articles on privacy in its most recent edition: A Reasonableness Approach to Searches After the Jones GPS Tracking Case by Peter Swire In the oral argument this fall in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:47 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: In the Supreme Court's recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v.... [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:23 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Priester (Florida Coastal School of Law) has posted Five Answers and Three Questions after United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The answer is unclear.Recently, SCOTUS decided United States v Jones, requiring a warrant prior to installing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's vehicle. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:40 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The answer is unclear.Recently, SCOTUS decided United States v Jones, requiring a warrant prior to installing a GPS tracking device on a drug suspect's vehicle. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm by Maritime Blogger
  If you are a U.S. mariner and find yourself injured while onboard a vessel it’s always a good idea to find a good Jones Act lawyer by state. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:39 am by Zukerman
Jones, Docket No. 10-1259, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a vote of 9 to 0, held that the installation of a global positioning system (GPS) tracking device on a suspect’s vehicle, without a warrant, constituted an unlawful search under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:12 am by Andrew W. Torrance
(U.S. 2012) (previously discussed on LEXVIVO) the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the July 29, 2011, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") decision, The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Protecting privacy: Beyond the ConstitutionMost legal privacy protections in federal law arise from statutes, not Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and scholar Erin Murphy has helpfully compiled and analyzed those statutory provisions, noting that "at least four Supreme Court justices recently suggested in United States v. [read post]