Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 2101 - 2120 of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am by SHG
I am pleased he has taken on this case. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the instant case, I am of the opinion that it is not the appropriate recourse.” [94] McLachlin CJ, Binnie, LeBel, Charron and Rothstein JJ agreed with this judgment. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
The focus on and anxiety about (purposeful) shaming takes particular effect in a now well-known case, United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:35 am by Frances Rogers
The Court of Appeals erroneously relied upon its earlier decision in the case of International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:03 pm
United States that the plaintiff had an individual right to challenge a violation of the VCCR. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” The judge clearly had regard to Ms Ntuli’s stated motives for wanting to sell her story (see, for example, paragraph 32 of his judgment). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1) applied in all its force, and it followed from the reasoning of the Strasbourg Court in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR as interpreted by the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74 that the Treasury was obliged to afford the claimant bank sufficient disclosure to enable it to give effective instructions about the essential allegations made against it. [read post]