Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 12,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Many states have a common-law pre-discovery disclosure rule, and California has one by statute. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm
Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Dr. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:45 pm
Yes, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:32 pm
In Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
Sprint Corporation, a Sprint Communications Company, L.P., et al., No. 2:14-cv- 02461-TLN-AC, pending before the Honorable Troy Nunley in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “Action”) Quintilone & Associates and a team of lawyer successfully reached a settlement of claims that Sprint violated various provisions of California’s wage and hour laws by, among other things, allegedly failing to: provide… [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
California (1967) 386 U.S. 18, 24; see, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 7:45 pm
– United States District Court- Northern District of California – March 13, 2012) involves a patent dispute. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:33 am
Jordan Scott filed a copyright infringement suit today in the United States District Court in the Central California District against "Twilight" author Stephenie Meyer for copyright infringement. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court released its judgment in City Of Ontario, California, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:26 am
Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – October 5, 2022) involves two class action claims. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:18 pm
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Cook v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 4:42 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:47 am
Healthcare facilities can’t bring False Claims Act lawsuits to enforce ceiling-price contracts between drug manufacturers and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, according to the United States Supreme Court in Astra USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
