Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 10,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
” This is not simply stirring rhetoric; it represents a repudiation of the elegiac yet resigned attitude toward Native dispossession that has marked the Court’s Indian law decisions as far back as Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
La Boom Disco, Inc., 955 F.3d 279, 283-84 (2d Cir. 2020); Marks v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
La Boom Disco, Inc., 955 F.3d 279, 283-84 (2d Cir. 2020); Marks v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:38 am
United StatesCommittee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
In United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm
Last month marks two years since the Supreme Court held, in Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Grp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Grp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:22 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released its final provisions pertaining to reduction of Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under certain circumstances in view of the Federal Circuit decision in Supernus (Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
In a closely watched case, at least by trademark attorneys, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a proposed mark comprising a generic term coupled with ".com" is not automatically generic, but may be registrable provided that consumers perceive the mark as a source indicator. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:00 pm
Post By Nicholas Krob When the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
The logo is a registered trade mark, owned by the New York State Department of Economic Development. [read post]
