Search for: "Wells v. Wise"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
In other words, if the Respondents had raised a Commerce Clause challenge, as well -- something they were wise not to do, not of least of which because statutes governing medical facilities plainly are valid Commerce legislation -- the Court might well have invalidated the statute, even though there would have been no majority of the Court for any particular ground of invalidation (a form of "Tidewater Transfer" disposition). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
In other words, if the Respondents had raised a Commerce Clause challenge, as well -- something they were wise not to do, not of least of which because statutes governing medical facilities plainly are valid Commerce legislation -- the Court might well have invalidated the statute, even though there would have been no majority of the Court for any particular ground of invalidation (a form of "Tidewater Transfer" disposition). [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 4:04 am
Well, what is he supposed to talk about when he appears before voters? [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:03 am
Brady v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:11 pm
It was not in the famous Betamax case, but almost a decade before that, in the largely forgotten case of Williams & Wilkins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:10 am
The hyperbolators at Chambers and the Legal 500 have done him proud - although I am not entirely sure the hyperbolators were wise in their use of the adverb ‘absurdly’ in this quote from 2002; given the synonyms for ‘absurdly’: “unquestionably, absurdly great mind as well as hardworking and demanding”. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Kelner, an attorney with the firm, write that Cuffy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Kelner, an attorney with the firm, write that Cuffy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
First on the list to think about is wisely "don't do it. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:39 pm
And, well, that content is owned by Viacom. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 5:36 pm
Moreover, this case is not similar to Int'l Order of Job's Daughters v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 12:23 pm
(Which is not to say such decisions are permissible, or wise.) [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
Cardozo counters with scenarios in which it would be neither wise nor prudent for a driver to stop and look. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
In criminal law, for example, the authors concentrate on death penalty law, even up through People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Armed Forces policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" toward homosexuals are well known. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:47 am
Above: the IPKat greets another new SI with unfeigned excitementIn other words, says the IPKat, get wise and get a licence, or - depending on your luck - get sued or get away with your infringement scot-free. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:15 pm
V. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
The case is Redwood v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:18 am
On the one hand, he trusted Yale law students to use their freedom well. [read post]
