Search for: "Winners Corporation"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 1:33 pm
To be clear, I don’t think corporations are angels or that there is never a time when a market can’t be naturally subject to a great deal of control by one company or a handful of companies. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
As his criminal trial gets underway in New York City, disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein would like us to forget what’s going on in that courtroom and instead focus on all he has done to help launch the careers of female filmmakers. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens, The Making of a Justice: Reflections on My First 94 Years (Little Brown and Company 2019)When John Paul Stevens died in mid-July, the nation not only mourned the death of a great justice, it also acknowledged the passing of an era on the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:27 pm
Second Circuit: A trust, like a corporation, is a collective entity that has no such Fifth Amendment right. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
There has been a nine-year battle over whether employers who provide insurance must include prescription contraceptives at no cost to the patients. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:13 am
Beyond the corporate blawgers, I had added very few in quite some time. * evolution of the optimal number of blog contributors. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
Wall Street’s winners are now trying to leverage those gains into permanent political victories, both to entrench the system of favors that helped them succeed and to cut the “entitlements” that generate rival claims to the public weal. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:19 pm
We welcome all the time championship sports teams to the white house to celebrate their victories and I thought we ought to do the same thing for the winners of science fairs and robotic contests and math competitions. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
(The ability to sue one’s employer—such as the corporation for which one works—is central to the enforcement of Title VII, because individuals cannot be held liable under the statute.) [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
bit.ly/Hy4ioP (Rania Afram) Cloud Hosting Continues to Explode: Expect Law Firms and Legal Publishers to Use – bit.ly/IlAiPF (Kevin O’Keefe) Company Computer Policies Risk Becoming Obsolete – bit.ly/HxO8vB (Nick Ackerman) Email Address Spoofing – What You Need To Know – bit.ly/Hyrao6 (Jeff Orloff) Foreign Relations Law: Does The US Always Come Out A Winner? [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:02 am
Someone who recently decided to go it alone after having been signed to a major label or other similar situation where a corporate sponsor “owned the consumer relationship” (a vile phrase, but accurate). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
State Department, and international corporate law. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:16 am
This one could be a winner. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 10 December 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Sahota v Middlesex Broadcasting Corporation Limited [2021] EWHC 3363 (QB). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
The Trump administration was a four-year-long war on women’s health. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm
Without a doubt, there is merit to the professors' case, although I bristle at the letter's broad-brush statements and overt stance that is pro-large-corporate-entity. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
Wall Street's winners are now trying to leverage those gains into permanent political victories, both to entrench the system of favors that helped them succeed and to cut the "entitlements" that generate rival claims to the public weal. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:29 am
And I was there in Shea Stadium for all four of the home games, having used some creative means of getting inside, since most of the tickets went corporate. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:29 am
Another, the winner of a Pulitzer Prize (plus two additional Pulitzer nominations), a Polk Award, and an IRE Medal, is a regular donor. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Greensburg Community School Corporation In his lawsuit, A.H. claimed that the short-hair policy was unlawful under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the federal constitution, as well as under Title IX, the federal law banning sex discrimination by educational institutions. [read post]
