Search for: "X, Y " Results 2101 - 2120 of 4,307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 7:42 am
For example, he would find properties where tenants had recently died and then amend the housing file so that Mr X was shown as the joint tenant of Mrs Y and, hence, Mr X could inherit the tenancy by succession. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 6:59 pm
But in summation, the government argued from the omissions in Caruto's statement, repeatedly asking the jurors "Why did she not say [X, Y, or Z as to the truck]? [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations Q is for Quid Pro Quo R is… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 9:25 am by Raymond McKenzie
Provide Defendant’s federal and state income tax returns for the years x, y and z, including any Schedules thereto, whether such returns were filed individually or jointly. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:35 am
If, for example, y was the amount spent on travel in a year, then some x's might be x7="married or not", x21="number of kids", and so on. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:10 pm by So
… es tan fácil como pasar una cantidad “X” de la cuenta de cheques del negocio a mi cuenta personal… o dime, ¡please! [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
[IPBiz: hmmm, ranges from x to y is not a synonym for is in the range between x and y.] [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 6:37 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
The facts of the case can be summarized as follows: On 31 July 2015 company X filed a complaint against company Y and against one Ms Inmaculada, exercising two different legal actions against them: an action against company Y aimed at claiming the ownership of a utility model and an unfair competition action against Ms Inmaculada. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:33 am
You need N-d to specify what judges should do, given interpretation N-i; without it, you have no reason to prefer Result X, entailed by N-d and N-i, to inconsistent Result Y, which follows from N-i and a different normative theory of decision-making, N-d2. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:11 am by SHG
He's certainly right that firms are experiencing "problems" with generations X and Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:44 am by Nikolai de Koning
For most of the transactions (68 to 72% for PFOF trading venue X and 81 to 83% for PFOF trading venue Y) the execution price was worse. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:25 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If the legislative authority says that offenses, X, Y, and Z are punishable by death and in the same enactment exempts offenses punishable by death from the statute of limitations, it has decided that offenses X, Y, and Z are exempt from the statute of limitations. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:15 am by Clark
I have no good response to the "this puts a nickel in the pocket of bad-group-X" other than, perhaps, donating a quarter to good-group-Y. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Corbin Bridge
T represents a notional age at which the business owner has in mind for a sale, and the X-axis also dissects the Y-axis at a fair sales price. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:30 am by ToddHenderson
The typical slippery slope argument looks something like this: if we allow X, then inevitably Y will be permitted, where X is acceptable but Y is unacceptable. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:58 am by Grace Yang
This is because if your trade secrecy agreement says not to steal X, Y and Z and an employee steals X, Y or Z, you can sue that employee for what should be a relatively clearcut breach of contract, rather than having to prove out everything related to trade secrets, as mentioned above. [read post]