Search for: "Abid v. Abid" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Deferential Exploring the Use of Reissue Applications to Amend Invalidity Findings in the District Courts Analyzing the Evolving Utilization of IPR and Other PTO Proceedings in Paragraph IV Litigation Understanding the Importance of Abiding by Local Rules: A Magistrate's Perspective A View from the Bench: The Judges Speak Exploring New Developments in Double-Patenting Type Obviousness and Federal Circuit and PTO Discord on Obviousness Experts, Problems of Proof, Dispositive Motions and… [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Deferential Exploring the Use of Reissue Applications to Amend Invalidity Findings in the District Courts Analyzing the Evolving Utilization of IPR and Other PTO Proceedings in Paragraph IV Litigation Understanding the Importance of Abiding by Local Rules: A Magistrate's Perspective A View from the Bench: The Judges Speak Exploring New Developments in Double-Patenting Type Obviousness and Federal Circuit and PTO Discord on Obviousness Experts, Problems of Proof, Dispositive Motions and… [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit Judge Eric Clay dissented (Loyd v Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland, September 10, 2014, Gilman, R). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
 Judge Noonan says that these people are often upstanding, otherwise-law-abiding citizens, and maybe we should publicize more highly the long sentences we often impose in an effort to deter misconduct.At least in the Court of Appeals, kiddie porn is the crack cocaine of the 21st century. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:07 am by Jennifer Lynch
The CPRA was intended to ensure government accountability; with a ruling like this, the public’s ability to be a check against arbitrary and discriminatory police practices is severely weakened. - Court Order — EFF & ACLU v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am by Jack Sharman
Dervan at the White Collar Crime Prof blog, focusing on the Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am by Stefan Passantino
  What is not obvious to all is whether the United States Supreme Court will agree that anyone can be forced to abide by such restrictions consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
The ALJ further found that he admitted that he knew he was not going to pay the physicians the amounts listed in the LCAs despite having signed an agreement to abide by the terms of the LCAs when he signed the H-1B petitions. [read post]