Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Clinton, then, was announcing what might have been considered Option C — a massive lawsuit, perhaps the biggest civil case the federal government had ever filed, in any court. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am by Rick Hills
My example of a point in the black circle of "preemption" is Judge Silberman's use of Machinist preemption to eliminate President Clinton's executive order on replacement of striking workers in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
” The film attributes the RBG phenomenon to the justice’s blistering dissents in 2013 and 2014, in cases like Shelby County v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:06 pm
(It would bear some resemblance to the facts underlying Ohralik v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Clear precedent, and subsequent decisions like MGM v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
  Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:26 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  This language was relied upon by the Supreme Court in striking down Nebraska’s PBA ban in Stenberg v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Say that during the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, a publisher tells a Congressman “If you vote to impeach Clinton, I will publish information about your own sexual indiscretion. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:55 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" pjblack.me/sKsOV5 hillary clinton has been on top 16 times since 1993: "President Obama and Hillary Clinton Top the List of Most Admired" pjblack.me/v1TNdj a fun piece from @politico: "Top 10 pundit do-overs of 2011" pjblack.me/vmxKVp i can't wait! [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:03 pm by Bill Otis
  While I was in a career position, I had a case, Dickerson  v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Just as importantly, she was an evangelical who was expressly promised to the right wing to be for overturning Roe v. [read post]