Search for: "Cohen v. Cohen"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm
Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740 (1998) (under federal constitution, party may not use a declaratory judgment to get advance ruling on an affirmative defense); see also Cohen v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:04 am
Cohen, as two Justices in the majority urged it to do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:16 pm
Cohen, 343 Mass. 195, 199 (1961) (discharged employee may use remembered information to solicit clients) (cited in Wordwave, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
Randy Cohen, The Ethicist: Wi-Fi Fairness, N. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Andrew Hamma and Caitlin Emma at Politico also look at Janus, as do Mary Bottari at In These Times and Rachel Cohen at The Intercept. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
For The New York Times, Adam Cohen reviews Joan Biskupic’s “assiduously reported and briskly written biography” of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:20 am
The majority instead has decided to dismiss a case over which we have jurisdiction, thereby violating the longstanding rule, dating back to Cohens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
MySpace, Inc., Cohen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
California viewed Cohen's display of "Fuck the Draft" on his jacket as "speech";[140] City of Ladue v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz,… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
” Cohen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Cohen, 756 A.2d 1166 (Pa. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm
If that were not so, reporters might not be able to credibly promise confidentiality to sources (This is the subject of Cohen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 10:04 am
No. 403 v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Olson v. [read post]
