Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C" Results 2121 - 2140 of 7,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2008, 6:06 am
ASIC will provide relief for transactions that satisfy all of the following requirements: a) the market maker must be an entity that makes a market as set out in section 766D of the Corporations Act 2001 b) the market maker must hold an Australian financial services licence relating to making a market or relies upon an exemption so it does not need an Australian financial services licence; c) the covered short sale is a bona fide transaction to manage the… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
This agreement can be binding on the IRS if it meets the requirements of IRC § 6015(c)(3)(C). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
This agreement can be binding on the IRS if it meets the requirements of IRC § 6015(c)(3)(C). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
This agreement can be binding on the IRS if it meets the requirements of IRC § 6015(c)(3)(C). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
Teddy Award-Winning Employers Showcase Their Successful Strategies   Speaker: Frank Altiere, President, PMA Management Corp Speaker: Roberto Ceniceros, Senior Editor, Risk & Insurance Magazine Room: Islander B-C Session Number: M2 Time: Thursday, December 07, 2017: 8:30 AM – 9:45 AM     Gain direct insight into how risk managers and safety professionals created some of the most successful programs in the nation in this roundtable… [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 10:16 am by Chris Castle
Further, the letter agreements do not change or modify application of the terms to be codified at 37 C.F.R. 385 Subparts C and D, including as they apply to any participant. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:58 am by Michelle Yeary
 Or, where a plaintiff (or a defendant, for that matter) loses the product in question, (e)(2)(B) should allow the court to bar any pre-loss expert report without a showing of bad faith. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:41 am by Gene Takagi
For California nonprofit public benefit corporations, the answer is “no. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by admin
” For entities with shares or interests traded on a public exchange, or registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the “responsible party” is (a) a principal officer, if the business is a corporation, (b) a general partner, if a partnership, (c) the owner of an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner or (d) a grantor, owner, or trustor, if a trust. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:08 am by Broc Romanek
These findings suggest (a) Delaware courts' strengths are unique in, but limited to, corporate law, even in the "corporate" context of M&A contracts; (b) the use of arbitration turns as much on the value of appeals, trust in courts, and value-at-risk as litigation costs; and (c) the quality of lawyering varies significantly, even on the most "legal" aspects of an M&A contract. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 11:22 am
Chiarappa was the purchasing agent for the John Galt Corporation and is alleged to have stolen $1.2 million from the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and Arch Insurance Group in connection to the abatement and deconstruction of the Deutsche Bank building. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:17 am by Thomas Kidera
Petitioners request the court clarify whether BNY Mellon must: (a) pay disbursements first and subsequently adjust the overcollateralization calculation to prevent leakage; (b) pay disbursements first and make no adjustment to the overcollateralization calculation, thereby permitting leakage; or (c) change its settlement disbursement operations to “write up first and pay second. [read post]