Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
He is the coauthor with Anthony D’Amato of the Law of Nations Scholars amicus brief submitted in support of neither party in Kiobel v. [read post]
The judges’ conclusions on the key issues In order to make good an art 14 claim, a claimant has to establish that (a) the circumstances fall within the ambit of a substantive Convention right, (b) the claimant has a relevant status for the purposes of art 14, (c) they have been treated differently from others in a similar situation, by reason of their status; if so the burden is then on the state to demonstrate (d) whether the difference in treatment is objectively justified.… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:04 am by Matt Osenga
The court noted that performing an otherwise abstract idea on a computer does not render it patentable. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
See, e.g., Report at 13 n.22; C-SPAN at 2:10:50. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Further, “the court shall pro rate each parent’s share of reasonable health care expenses not reimbursed or paid by insurance ... in the same proportion as each parent’s income is to the combined parental income” (Domestic Relations Law § 240[1–b] [c][5][v]). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:21 pm by lsico
This section is organized as follows: Paragraph (a) contains definitions for the purposes of §4.7; paragraph (b) contains the relief available to commodity pool operators under §4.7; paragraph (c) contains the relief available to commodity trading advisors under §4.7; paragraph (d) concerns the Notice of Claim for Exemption under §4.7; and paragraph (e) addresses the effect of an insignificant deviation from a term, condition or requirement of §4.7. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tax: Treaties; GAARCanada v. [read post]