Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  W/o proof that there’d been panhandling in garages, couldn’t ban panhandling in garages. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Corresponded to otherwise broadening trends in TM law, so conflict is more significant than it’s ever been. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 (2)  A covered entity must meet the requirements described in paragraph (c), (e), or (f) of this section for uses or disclosures required by law. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
22 May 2016, 2:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Bill C-14, should it become law, will invariably requi [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
And yet it feels yucky: the manipulation isn’t tied to changing your decision from what you’d otherwise make, it’s something else. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  One filing v. three, we also felt that there were some things left unsaid, in part b/c at the hearings proponents were given a lot of opportunity to explain their cases, so we ran out of time. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Then the action has shifted to the rulemaking b/c of all these adversely affected people. [read post]