Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 7,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 6:58 pm
RC: Yes, it does. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
I give them an A+++. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 3:37 pm
Agents 1 and 2 regard X and Y as good, but X and Y is considered by both parties to be less good than their original principles or sets of values and policies. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:45 pm
For the record, I have no idea why it thinks I like Taylor Swift. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
Does defendant have a meritorious defense? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
This two-part blog post series will summarize the provisions of Title I, the Musical Works Modernization Act (or MWM Act) and Title III, the Allocation for Music Producers Act (or AMP Act). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Their conclusions are, basically, “my hunch is that X is a match for Y,” he said. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
What does the attorney say about the negative reviews? [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:42 am
Final RequestsThe appellants request that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the claims of the main and sole request filed during the oral proceedings of 9 November 2018.X. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
The decision not to exhibit there this year does not mean it will never exhibit there again, he added. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:02 am
Even the customer who does not order directly would not put down the name “MO” for ordering, but rather the model number. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
(Pix Credit U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
He concluded: “I wish I had never used UpCounsel and I’m warning all startups, business and companies out there to never make the same mistake! [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:42 am
Most say: send x command to do y. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:05 pm
You still need to have an app to handle the action, but with the newest iPhones that app does not need to be open. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:50 pm
Their appellate opinion wants something like: “I only confessed to this because you promised me X, Y, and Z. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm
I certify that I assigned (IMPORTER NAME) to receive the (X REDUCED TAX RATE/CREDIT) for (X NUMBER OF BARRELS/WINE GALLONS/PROOF GALLONS) for (X CALENDAR YEAR). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
Later in the oral proceedings, the appellant withdrew its main request and auxiliary requests I to XIII and renamed its auxiliary request XIV as its new sole request. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 11:07 am
[I think this is the right result under the law, which highlights that the current law has nothing to do with truth or truthful communication. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
In a summons to oral proceedings the board gave the following preliminary assessment:(i) The [first] intervention was admissible;(ii) There was doubt as to whether claim 1 of the patent complied with Article 123(2) EPC (cf. the ground for opposition pursuant to Article 100(c) EPC);(iii) The ground for opposition pursuant to Article 100(b) EPC did not appear to prejudice the maintenance of the patent as granted; and(iv) The subject-matter of claim 1 did not appear to be new with respect to… [read post]
