Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 40,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
Aronshtein, 2011 WL 5222881 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 2005 WL 2094903 at *2 (E.D.Pa.2005). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:53 pm
Therefore, the court granted defendant TRT USA Corp. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
The Circuit also says it does not matter that defendants had to cancel their vacation in order to remain at the house during the search. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 8:09 am
Please note that the authorization does not give the defendant permission to inquire about all matters of the plaintiff’s health, only those relevant to the plaintiff’s cause of action. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:00 pm
The defendant was sentenced to 2 years in prison, 10 years of supervised released, and was required to pay one of the victims $3.4 million. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:01 am
Ought not both the 1099 and partnership return be set aside in favor of a Form W-2? [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 9:26 pm
Hence, the Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss count 2. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 10:34 am
The case is closed and the insurer does not have to pay. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court, 6-2, last week affirmed the denial of relief to the defendants. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 7:46 pm
Basically, this question can be asked in this way: from what date does the clock begin to run on this cause of action and when does the clock expire? [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 11:05 am
R (on the application of REPIC Ltd) v (1) Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2) Environment Agency (Defendants) & (1) Scottish Environment Protection Agency (2) Electrolink Recylcing Ltd and (3) WERC Ltd T/A City Compliance Scheme (Interested Parties) [2009] EWHC 2015 (Admin) QBD (Admin) (Wyn Williams J) 31 July 2009 The Regulations adopted pursuant to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive of 2002 were not breached when… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:54 am
If, however, the amendment effects a substantive change in the law, the defendant does not receive the benefit of the change. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:32 am
Defendant does not meet requirements of "safety valve" provisions by disclosing evidence to probation officer during presentence investigation. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Here, a Nassau County Criminal Lawyer said the order of the Appellate Division does not expressly state that the reversal is on the law alone. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
§ 1225-C [2][A]). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
Thus, inasmuch as plaintiff's complaint does not state any cognizable claim in law or in equity, it must be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Heffez, 56 AD3d at 526; Simmons, 32 AD3d at 465). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:53 am
§ 3582(c)(2). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:53 am
Jorrisch looked at a subset of patient files, which does not represent a statistically significant size. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
The investigator did note, however, that Witness 2 might have been a more credible witness because she had no prior connection to Doe, Roe, or their respective Greek organizations. [read post]
