Search for: "Dept of Justice"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 4:01 am
(See Grace v Law, 24 NY3d 203 [2014]; see also Buczek v Dell & Little, 127 AD3d 1121 [2d Dept. 2015]). [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
On April 16, 2007, Westchester County Supreme Court Justice Joan B. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Edward Zelinsky maintains that in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am
In that case, in two separate decisions, both dated Dec. 2, 2011, and both entered on Dec. 7, 2011, Justice Allan B. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:02 am
(See Knop.fv San.ford, 123 AD3d 521, 521 (1st Dept 2014].) [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
Hopping, 171 AD2d 63 (2d Dept 1991), upon which the lower court principally relied, was "more precise" than the provision in the Teutuls' letter agreement [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
., 234 AD2d 181 (1st Dept 1996). [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm
Racial justice a. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
Div. 1st Dept. 2001). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
The Appellate Division – First Department later affirmed Justice Fried’s Barasch decision, but on other grounds, ruling that the entity was “estopped” from denying the transaction was an “all or substantially all” transaction because it sent a notice of shareholders meeting stating that it was exactly that: a “disposition of substantially all of the assets” of the company (100 AD3d 562 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
In the words of Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth H. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
It pointed out that a court has the inherent power to relieve a party from judgments taken through mistake or inadvertence in the interest of justice, and directed that the awards of child support, maintenance, arrears, and an attorney's fee had to be recalculated based on the correct figures. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
Dept of Education’s “Teaching American History” program. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:53 am
Kings County Supreme Court Justice Peter P. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:01 am
The same reluctance to intervene without dissolution and a full accounting applies to disputes between members of a limited liability company. while the Limited Liability Law does not expressly authorize a buyout in a dissolution proceeding, it is an appropriate equitable remedy in such a proceedin9 (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
., LLC, 105 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm
’” But Justice Livote concluded that Dvir only had himself to blame for his predicament: In the instant case, removal of Dvir as an officer for cause will severely impact the value of his investment. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
James Sensenbrenner, stated that Dept. of Justice’s interpretation of Sec. 215 was contrary to Congressional intent (though there is a dispute regarding whether Sensenbrenner was aware of DOJ’s interpretation prior to the Snowden disclosures). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:00 am
Alternatively, you can read a recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice David I. [read post]
