Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 20,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Of course, there are exceptions to the attorney client privilege, such as the crime-fraud exception, where legal advice is sought to advance a criminal or fraudulent purpose, but generally one's own attorney is not the one who seeks resort to this exception. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:58 am
Scheiner, Attorneys for the Injured, at 1-800-646-1210. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 2:09 pm
Needless to say, given that Judge Reinhardt wrote the majority opinion, you know how the case turned out: the denial of the defendant's habeas petition was reversed and remanded.The California Attorney General files a motion for panel rehearing (and rehearing en banc), an event that's likely going nowhere. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:57 am
By Eric Goldman BidZirk, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:05 am
Of course I am just providing GENERAL information here. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
This year one of the cases I discovered was People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
This year one of the cases I discovered was People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:33 pm
See Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
The case is - The People of the State of Colorado, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:46 am
” The judge went on to state: If we presume – as we must – that the General Assembly meant what it said and said what it meant, we must conclude that the tolling provision does not apply given the circumstances at issue in this case. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:58 am
Clarke v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am
Here, since the retainer agreement executed between plaintiffs and the Aboulafia firm, which constitutes “documentary evidence” within the purview of that section (see generally Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 84-85 [2d Dept 2010]), clearly limits the firm’s representation only to commencing a property damage claim against Marine. [read post]
Oregon's Court Of Appeals Rules That The Offer Of Judgment Rule Does Not Apply To Insurance Disputes
2 Jun 2010, 9:34 am
April 14, 2010), Oregon’s Court of Appeals ruled that ORCP 54 E does not apply to cases where an insured seeks recovery of attorney fees pursuant to ORS 742.061. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:17 am
Background: In Brackeen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:11 am
In Shively v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
Bruton v IC and The Duchy of Cornwall & The Attorney General to HRH the Prince of Wales (EA/2010/0182) 3 November 2011. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
