Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 8,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
In Lam v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:03 pm
Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., 137 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
Justice Rady of the Superior Court outlined the public interest purpose of the anti-SLAPP provisions, but also relied extensively on the 2015 decision of Baglow v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
” Does the court have jurisdiction? [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
” Does the court have jurisdiction? [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
It’s not Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Federal courts are in certain respects superior to state courts. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" However, said the court, PBA's petition must be denied because body-worn-camera footage at issue does not constitute a personnel record within the meaning of §50-a.The Appellate Division explained that in order to determine whether something is a "personnel record" within the meaning of §50-a of the Civil Rights Law, the threshold question is to determine whether the documents are "of significance to a superior in considering continued… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" However, said the court, PBA's petition must be denied because body-worn-camera footage at issue does not constitute a personnel record within the meaning of §50-a.The Appellate Division explained that in order to determine whether something is a "personnel record" within the meaning of §50-a of the Civil Rights Law, the threshold question is to determine whether the documents are "of significance to a superior in considering continued… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
’” The dissent highlighted the trial court’s “superior vantage point” and noted trial courts are “far better positioned to assess how to resolve the litigation most efficiently. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Superior Court (LaMarca), 134 Ariz. 177 (1982). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Superior Court (LaMarca), 134 Ariz. 177 (1982). [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 3:50 pm
If filing for injunctive relief in Washington state superior court, you must allow enough time to give all parties notice of the lawsuit and get the case on the courts calendar which can take time. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 3:50 pm
If filing for injunctive relief in Washington state superior court, you must allow enough time to give all parties notice of the lawsuit and get the case on the courts calendar which can take time. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
See Del. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1027 (2012). [read post]
