Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
The Pirates lost 28-17 to the Tar Heels in 2003, when they went 1-11. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by LindaMBeale
Ryan's critics have noted that his plan actually does very little about the "crippling debt crisis. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:48 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Note:  Chapter 41, Section 7 and Chapter 89, Sections 1 and 6 of Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law has been updated to include this decision. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:23 am
Two important stipulations in the statute regarding the payment of future medical expenses are as follows: 1. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 6:51 am by IP Dragon
Within six months after the grant of patent anyone could request the Patent Office to revoke the patent (article 41). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm by Coral Beach
Of the 41 patients who answered questions about sexual activity, 88 percent reported male-to-male sexual contact. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
See, e.g., '458 patent col.1 ll.11-12, 40-41, 45-46, col.3 ll.33, 39-40, 45, col.4 ll.5-6, 20, 56.The counterpoint, of course, being not to read limitations of the specification into the claims.On claim differentiation: "When different words or phrases are used in separate claims, a difference in meaning is presumed. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:57 am by Scott R. Flick
  The webinar is at 1 pm ET on March 20th, and you can register for it here. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
This relationship is important, although it does not always hold true. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:17 am by INFORRM
Explanatory Notes are optional for Private Members Bills but Lord Lester’s team have now prepared 41 page Explanatory Notes in order to “assist understanding of the Bill against the background of existing law, and to explain the nature of the changes the Bill seeks to make in reforming the law, and the reasons for those changes” [1]. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 12:58 am
The AmeriKat recommends that readers watch the hearings here (Peters' testimony, at the 41 minute mark). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Any law student would recognise some of the famous non-criminal names on the table which led to this mess, obtained by a Conservative MP Philip Davies, whom I debated about this on BBC Radio 5 Live (listen by clicking here, from 1:41:15). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm by emagraken
Norlander, 2012 BCSC 719 (Master)… [34]         Read together, the above authorities stand for these propositions: 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
Recently, the CRCICA has brought into force the new Arbitration Rules (the “2011 Rules”) with effect from March 1, 2011, which is based upon the revised UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 2010 (with a few adaptations stemming from CRCICA’s position as an arbitral institution and an appointing authority). [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
Meanwhile, another embattled company - Chesapeake Energy - filed this additional soliciting material that disclosed the release of these two so-called "contextual tweets":- Tweet 1) Fact: 41% of S&P 500 companies have split the Chairman and CEO positions and only 21% have truly independent chairmen [read post]