Search for: "Does 1-75"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2017, 12:00 am
A director does not qualify as “independent” if he or she has a “material relationship with the company. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:14 pm
The symposium will take place over 2 days at the University of New South Wales Law School, Sydney, Australia on 1 and 2 August 2014. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
Stat. 440.25(1)) within 130 days after a PFB is filed. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"When does an arbitrator exceed his or her power under the statute? [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:39 pm
1. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* The UK Implements the Unitary Patent - Statutory Instrument passedDarren and his colleague Robert Barker pen a detailed post upon the Statutory Instrument that will implement the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in UK law, which was approved by the House of Commons on 1 March and the House of Lords on 2 March. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 7:09 am
*UPDATE 3.19.2020* Note: Family First Coronavirus Response Act does not go into effect until April 1, 2020 The “Families First Coronavirus Response Act” has passed the Senate and has been signed by President Trump. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
Table 1. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:45 pm
Co., 2006 NY Slip Op 4486, 1 (3rd Dept. 2006).Contrast those decisions to Kings County New York City Civil Court Judge Genine Edwards' July 2006 decision in Elite Med. [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:20 am
Id. at 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 11:00 am
The FFCRA is effective April 1, 2020. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:50 am
See Section 3729(a)(1). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:02 am
We should expect that some timing issues will continue to affect the March 1, 2020 update report. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Since the Romanian Government does not give any reason why recognition should not be granted, there should be no obstacle to automatic recognition. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
Inc., 355 F.3d 61, 75 (2d Cir. 2003). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:48 am
., if 1. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
The Appellate Division found that “[b]oth of these prerequisites for arbitrability are satisfied in the instant matter” since: 1. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
Tarmann, 75 USPQ2d 1811 (TTAB 2005). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
That’s what legislation often does. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
Section 512(c)(1)(A) protects a service provider who: does not have “actual knowledge” of the infringing material or activity using the material;7 in the absence of such knowledge, “is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the infringing activity is apparent,”;8 or upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access, to the material.9 In addition to the knowledge-based framework above, § 512(c) states… [read post]
