Search for: "EMPLOYERS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 4:08 pm
In their opinion, based upon their state bar regulations, they felt that “adverse evidence” that might include a report from a commissioned medical exam done by another state agency such as a Department of Labor and Industries panel evaluation, or an examination done by an insurance company, or an examination done by a self-insured employer were never to be considered credible as the examiner is evaluating the individual strictly for the purpose of… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:31 am
Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 7.3 provides: A lawyer shall not solicit professional employment as a private practitioner for the lawyer, a partner or associate through direct personal contact or through live telephone contact, with a non-lawyer who has not sought advice regarding employment of a lawyer. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
By all accounts, it certainly seems so.There is hardly ever a proposed legal change to California's workers' compensation system that doesn't draw out divisive, contentious battle ground lines between various interest groups, but the adoption of a drug formulary has parties that are normally fighting each other embracing the concept.Assembly Bill 1124 (Perea, D-Fresno) drew support from representatives of employers, insurers and the medical cost containment industry… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:28 pm
Then the insurance company takes care of everything else: communicating with the employees and paying for the coverage. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
The trial court granted summary judgment to the insurer holding that: the victim did not have any rights relative to the insurance provider; the insurance policy required written consent for an assignment and there was no evidence of such consent; there was no privity between the clinic and the insurance provider; the clinic was not a beneficiary of the insurance policy; and the suit was a direct action against an insurance… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Comment This decision will be of interest to all contractual fact-finders, and of particular relevance to employers and their insurers. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
Weight was also placed on the US authority of In re British American Insurance Company Limited (425 BR 844 (SD Florida, 2010) which held that “operations” and “economic activity” amounted to “more than mere incorporation and record keeping”. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The company says, for instance, that the average cost of a claim in a carve-out program during the eight-year study period was $13,940.That's significantly lower than the average cost of a standard litigated claim.But, according to Elite, the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau and DWC don’t collect the same information for carve-outs that they do for other types of claims, which prevents direct comparison.That seems to me a study well worth… [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:40 am
How (if at all) are workers covered by workers’ comp and/or employer liability insurance? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 3:57 am
In Texas that state's Supreme Court recently extended the concept to the employer's insurance company, essentially removing "bad faith" from work comp. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:26 am
If willful intent is shown (“reckless disregard” under Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:35 pm
For instance, the company is not required to contribute to unemployment insurance funds, provide expensive benefits (e.g., medical insurance), or allow participation in retirement, profit sharing, and similar plans. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:35 pm
For instance, the company is not required to contribute to unemployment insurance funds, provide expensive benefits (e.g., medical insurance), or allow participation in retirement, profit sharing, and similar plans. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
FMI Found Liable Due to Vicarious Liability Under common law, independent contractors are considered liable for any act of negligence and the companies that hire them are protected from vicarious liability due to the fact that the contractors are not direct employees. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
FMI Found Liable Due to Vicarious Liability Under common law, independent contractors are considered liable for any act of negligence and the companies that hire them are protected from vicarious liability due to the fact that the contractors are not direct employees. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
FMI Found Liable Due to Vicarious Liability Under common law, independent contractors are considered liable for any act of negligence and the companies that hire them are protected from vicarious liability due to the fact that the contractors are not direct employees. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm
It is imperative to shop around different insurance companies to find the best rate possible. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:52 pm
Very often, however, the insurance company’s advice is motivated by its desire to limit their own exposure, rather than by the employer’s operational needs or policies. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:08 am
" Some states, such as Montana, go as far as giving employers and insurance companies that accept a claim the ability to dictate which doctor can carry out a patient's care. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Here, the plaintiff drove his wife’s van for work, held auto insurance on it, and generally paid for gas. [read post]
