Search for: "Eli Lilly "
Results 2121 - 2131
of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ June 23 Conference. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
There were 140 patent cases filed in the Northern District during 2007, an 11% increase from the 126 patent cases filed in 2006. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 1:49 am
This decision came online earlier this week, on 14 October 2024, and the outcome was a surprise to many. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Pix credit hereCates 1980 has distributed its February 2024 Report. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
One lot of Glucagon Emergency Kits have been recalled by Eli Lilly and Company due to a potentially dangerous loss of potency. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Biden Claims 9 Super Tuesday Victories, Including Texas AP News – Steve Peoples and Will Weissert | Published: 3/4/2020 A resurgent Joe Biden scored victories from Texas to Massachusetts on Super Tuesday, revitalizing a presidential bid that was teetering on the edge of disaster just days earlier. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 WL 5216930, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
