Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
WalkerOn January 29, 2008, Judge Thomas Cahraman of the Riverside Superior Court ruled that CEQA did not require the Banning City Council to consider the Global Warming impacts of a project approved prior to the enactment of AB 32.In Highland Springs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
A Riverside County Superior Court judge ruled that there was no legal requirement to analyze greenhouse gases (GHGs) and global warming impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Highland Springs v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 5:47 am
The Supreme Court's decision yesterday in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:56 pm
Lyle Denniston reports that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Giles v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:26 am
In the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse reports, "Justices Chilly to Bid to Alter Lethal Injection. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
Last month, when we posted on a federal judge’s ruling upholding a California law that would curb greenhouse-gas auto emissions, we noted that the EPA had to grant California a waiver to set stricter standards than those that existed under the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:29 am
EPA's press release was titled "America Receives a National Solution for Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 6:52 am
End-of-semester craziness has dashed my hopes to compare beat reporters' takes on yesterday's arguments in the latest Gitmo-detainee-rights case, Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:12 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse offers an excellent preview of Wednesday's oral argument in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 9:40 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard a case (LaRue v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:56 am
One of Blawgletter's favorite legal journalists, Linda Greenhouse, writes today about the oral argument yesterday in LaRue v. [read post]