Search for: "High v State" Results 2121 - 2140 of 35,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
Supp. 2d 447 (D.N.J. 2008) (finding implied preemption of state law claims against Snapple for for using "all natural" to describe beverages containing high fructose corn syrup); Fraker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:17 pm by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: failure to warn, pharmaceuticals, preemption, Wyeth What Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In a long-running dispute, a Texas state appeals court in Kountze Independent School District v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[FN5] The end of the pipeline, or "zenith" as plaintiffs describe it, is admission to one of eight New York City specialized high schools based on the results of the Special High School Admissions Test (the SHSAT). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by CMS
That decision was challenged by BAI, one of P&O’s competitors, and the GC annulled the Commission’s decision on the grounds that it had misinterpreted the State Aid rules (Case T-14/96 Bretagne Angleterre Irelande (BAI) v European Commission). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week agreed to hear arguments in Ex Parte Terrell to determine whether the Supreme Court's Miller v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 2:26 pm by Karwan Eskerie
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]