Search for: "Hill v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 5,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Retirement Plan for General Employees v McGraw-Hill Cos., 120 AD3d 1052, 2014 NY Slip Op 06154 [1st Dept Sept. 11, 2014], in which the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a books-and-records proceeding brought against McGraw-Hill, and held that the petitioning pension fund’s stated purpose of the requested inspection, to investigate the board’s oversight of… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
(NYC Civil, Kings Co., decided 9/15/08); Lenox Hill Radiology, PC, a/a/o Busanet v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Hill, 199 N.J. 545, 974 A.2d 403 (2009). [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:45 am
Hill NAACP v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
Julia Manchester of The Hill reports that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will not attend President Donald Trump’s first State of the Union on Tuesday; she will speak at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
No. 17-01005-ess.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
’” And in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Hill’s Pet Nutrition; and Tas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Hill & Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Case C-281/02, Owusu v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:00 am
Int’l House of Pancakes, 513 F.2d 114, 123 (8th Cir. 1975); Hill v. [read post]
