Search for: "Holme v. Holme"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
I’m delighted to respond to Nell Minow’s thoughtful and interesting testimony on the Citizens United case. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
[An attack on the independence of the federal judiciary.] [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Professor Jessica Litman has a fascinating forthcoming book chapter on the history of the Lanham Act and the influence of Edward S. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
It is not based on section 75(2)(o).The difficulty I have with the Kennon principle as a part of the contribution based division can be illustrated by reference to an anecdote recounted by the great American judge and jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes in his article The Path of the Law (10 Harv, LR Rev. 457 (1897)). [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
” You may recognize the dialogue between me and my platoon sergeant as a parable sometimes told of detective Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Dr. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 5:50 am
Estas vías de indagación tienen el potencial de nutrir una teoría analítica, una teoría normativa, una teoría de interpretación y una teoría social del silencio en el derecho. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Opening batsman for UK Law Blawging, Nick Holmes of Binary Law, has catalogued them in detail with the precision of a test match scorer. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
