Search for: "In re: Roger"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 7:37 pm
After the state re-administered the test to students itself the following year, results dropped down to 75%. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
The key decision is the 1942 decision of Justice Roger Traynor, of the Cal S. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Rogers) did precisely the opposite. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
Last year (coincidentally, almost to the day), this blog was all atwitter (you’re following us, right?) [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:35 am
There may be a "person of interest" in the re-opened case. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
At the Washington Post’s The Insiders blog, Ed Rogers contends that regardless of how the Court rules, a decision on health care in 2012 is a “can’t lose, win-win scenario” for Republicans. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:41 pm
We're about a week out from the Penn State scandal really breaking wide open and I continue to be impressed by the level of coverage put forth on that subject by the attorneys on the LexBlog Network. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Will Emerson says, “If you really wanna do this with your life, you have to believe you’re necessary. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
The real question about regulation, as Stanford economist Roger Noll told the Post, is whether it is on balance good or bad for society. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
So spreche die Werbeaussage von Roger Federer sogar deutlich für eine Gegenleistung, da er in seinem Beitrag zwar die Hoffnung äussert, die Dienste der REGA nie in Anspruch nehmen zu müssen, jedoch im Notfall auf kompetente Hilfe ("einen guten 'Return'") der REGA zählen wolle. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:51 pm
Then again, they’re often misunderstood right here at home — the adjectives “liberal” and “conservative,” for example, have very different meanings depending on whether they’re modifying a political or jurisprudential noun, but try telling that to the average journalist. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Res. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm
See In re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litig., 2008 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Clemens' lawyers did not invoke the Hyde Amendment, as the government's response points out, and could not do so in any event since he faces re-trial and has not yet prevailed. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
That cold, hard fact hasn’t stopped former MLB star pitcher Roger Clemens and his attorneys from asking a federal judge to force the government to pay him costs associated with a botched perjury trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm
We're in a global economic mess of the first order, and nobody seems to know what to do about it. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:10 am
(Thanks to Roger Meiners for the pointer.) [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
For example in monetary settlements, the winning party is often willing to re-negotiate the settlement before it goes to appeal so as to avoid full reversal and retrial. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 6:40 am
Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach Florida. [read post]
