Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
Sullivan, J., dissents with separate opinion: I respectfully dissent. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 1:00 am
Last LexBlogosphere update of the week, which we're kicking out the door at the end of the day (bringing perhaps a more diverse group of attorneys to the table than would be the case had we posted the update earlier). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:18 pm
But the rule for law firms to follow has remained the same over time: "With any widely disseminated message, you have to ask if you're prepared to see it in a publication," he said.New York-based Sullivan & Cromwell was highlighted for months on law blogs after former associate Aaron Charney filed a lawsuit in January 2007 alleging that he was subjected to sexual orientation harassment and retaliation by the firm. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:19 am
"We're going to try to take steps to correct that error. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:15 am
  You can download the decision directly from the court here.For now, the court's holding -- which relies primarily on the idea of stare decisis (or, in essence, we've already decided this in other cases so we're just going to apply it here) -- is found in this quote from Justice Breyer:We conclude that considerations of stare decisis strongly support our adherence to Sullivan and the long line of  related cases where we interpret… [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:32 am
The Court's invocation of stare decisis appears to rest on three considerations: (1) Sullivan's purported recognition of a cause of action for retaliation under §1982; (2) Jackson's (re)interpretation of Sullivan; and (3) the Courts of Appeals' view that §1981 provides a cause of action for retaliation. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:29 pm
From a tipster at Sullivan & Cromwell, reporting on remarks that chairman H. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:02 pm
Sullivan (In re Sullivan) ---- B.R. ----, 2008 WL ------------ (1st Cir. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:22 pm
The judge's response, according to Sullivan and the Tribune, was: "No, not right now. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:44 am
Sullivan (re Reconsideration Motion)** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->-->--> -->-->[][][][]-->Keywords: digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual propertyTo contribute to Marie… [read post]
8 May 2008, 11:26 pm
After Aaron Charney settled with Sullivan & Cromwell, he got himself a nice new apartment. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:09 am
  Bankers Trust was represented by Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
That this law may be a direct encroachment on fundamental human rights and principles of justice has been discussed elsewhere (Sullivan, Mullen, & Pathe, 2005). (1) These ethical, moral and political arguments aside, the specific nature of the Victorian Serious Sex Offender Monitoring Act leads to considerable debate about its appropriateness and creates a number of issues on public policy, theoretical, practical and clinical levels. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:25 am
It is possible, the commission argued, for law enforcement to re-identify a person by combining queries and the slightly redacted IP address. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Einstein's Notes, which operates online as HowIgotAnA.com, pays students to write down what professors say in class so that the notes can be re-sold to other students in advance of exams, Sullivan claims. [read post]