Search for: "Jackson v. R " Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
In response to the Village's appeal challenging the lower court's denial of its motion, the Appellate Division, citing Negron v Jackson, 273 AD2d 241, said that proba­tionary employee may not be fired for constitutionally impermissible reasons. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:02 am by Jon Hyman
Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From Willis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Tir Conaill Properties, L.C. v. 2401 Wilson, LLC - Arlington lawyer Heidi Meinzer of Bean Kinney & Korman on the firm's Virginia Real Estate, Land Use & Construction Law blog Something Has Definitely Changed: The "New Economy" and its Impact on Franchising - New York attorney Charles Internicola on his New York Franchise Law Blog Employees Claiming Emotional Distress Must Produce Social Network (Facebook and MySpace) Information In… [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am by Paul Jacobson
Jackson at Nixon Peabody:Brelyn Hammernick worked as a recruiter for TEKsystems, and signed a non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure agreement with TEKsystems. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am by Paul
Jackson at Nixon Peabody: Brelyn Hammernick worked as a recruiter for TEKsystems, and signed a non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure agreement with TEKsystems. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:17 am by Paul
Jackson at Nixon Peabody: Brelyn Hammernick worked as a recruiter for TEKsystems, and signed a non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure agreement with TEKsystems. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:10 am by Jon Hyman
– from GT LE Blog Free checklist on independent contractors – from Kiernan’s Corner: Preventive Law for Employers Discrimination Too Hot v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Jackson Labs (Patent Baristas) US: Complaint filed for review and correction of the patent term adjustment calculation: Magnachem International Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]