Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 2121 - 2140 of 29,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has concluded that even controversial live theater is protected First Amendment expression. [read post]
In response to the ruling, staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project Meagan Burrows stated: Today’s decision will ensure that women and people seeking abortion care in Guam are not denied access to the essential health care they need because of where they live. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The Act requires every state to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” However, in series of cases following the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 11:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that the literal translation is "Guys, let's live amicably," but "let's all get along" is a good idiomatic translation.) [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
To deport him to Mexico would surely radically disrupt his life, as well as the lives of his family.But he has a conviction for domestic violence, to which he pled no contest in 2017. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:56 pm by Nigel Stacey
Coast Guard units received distress calls stating that the F/V ARCTIC FOX II, a 66-foot commercial fishing boat, had begun taking on water. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
Fritz, American Sovereigns (Cambridge, 2007) Timothy Sandefur, The Right to Earn a Living (Cato Institute, 2010) Sonu Bedi, Rejecting Rights (Cambridge, 2009) Alison LaCroix, The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (Harvard, 2010) 2010: David Bernstein, Rehabilitating Lochner (Chicago 2011) (assigned ms) Brian Tamanaha, The Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton, 2009) Earl Maltz, Slavery and the Supreme Court, 1825-1861 (Kansas, 2009) Michael Vorenberg,… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant argued on appeal the initial warrant was overbroad because he lived with another person in the home and the warrant permitted the seizure of any electronic devices irrespective of ownership. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]