Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2014, 8:31 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In 1983, the American Bar Association adopted the ABA Model Rules that are the basis for most of the current codes of conduct in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
Katz to state on the record he would no longer practice ”medical-legal” examinations, repeatedly berated Dr, Katz, stating that “his career was over,” and even stated that defendants’ counsel wanted to “tear [Dr. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman, 134 S.Ct. 746 (2014), and having done so we recommend it to anyone representing overseas clients worried about being swept into the maw of the overlawyered legal climate in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
The private-public distinction, however, is not significant as long as the party is a state actor for the purpose of due process, and this Court has unequivocally stated that Amtrak is a state actor for this purpose. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
However, not long after plaintiff acquired its unit in 2011, the shareholders held an election for a four-member board designating one seat per unit, to which the plaintiff objected and contended that the proper size of the board should be five directors, not four. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
” It was written against the backdrop of the practices—eventually curtailed by the Statute of Monopolies—of the Crown in granting monopolies to court favorites in goods or businesses which had long before been enjoyed by the public. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
As he wrote in dissent in Austin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:39 am
In Hunt v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
Among other First Amendment cases, he prevailed in his argument before the Supreme Court on behalf of Senator Mitch McConnell as amicus curiae, defending the rights of corporations and unions to speak publicly about politics and elections in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In 2010, the same Supreme Court majority struck down the longstanding ban on corporate expenditures in federal elections in the Citizens United decision. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
When it comes to political campaign spending, Citizens United put corporations and labor unions on the same First Amendment plane as individuals. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:12 pm
Beaumont, the Court upheld the long-standing federal ban on corporations, at least so far as that provision applied to non-profit corporations. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
The Court's 5-4 decision was not particularly a surprise, as many saw McCutcheon as the sequel to 2010's Citizens United decision, in which the Court found restrictions on political expenditures by corporations and unions to be unconstitutional. [read post]
