Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
As a result, only the provisions of the EPC 1973 are applied.Computation of the beginning and the end of the TFO[4] In agreement with the parties the Board of appeal bases its considerations on the following factual situation: The wording of claim 1 according to the decision to grant a patent of October 26, 2006, comprised three parallel alternatives A, B, and C, whereas the wording of claim 1 of the patent specification in the relevant German version only contained the… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
(c) Any matter discussed in executive session shall be generally noted in the minutes of the immediately following meeting that is open to the entire membership. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
(a) Exclusion Amount- (1) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 2010(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘$5,000,000’ and inserting ‘$1,000,000’. (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Subparagraph (B) of section 2010(c)(3) of such Code is amended– (A) by striking ‘2011’ in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting ‘2012’, and (B) by striking ‘2010’ in clause (ii) and… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
§ 1805(a), (c). [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:58 am
" Isaiah J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm
Cranfill, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
Section 1(3) excludes from the ambit of s.1(1) and 1(1A) any course of conduct that: (a) is aimed at preventing or detecting crime; (b) is taken pursuant to any enactment or rule of law; or (c) is ‘reasonable’ in the particular circumstances of the case. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
Robert J. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:12 am
(b) Who Must Receive a Copy of the Petition. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Here is the application, in PDF and text: NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (ELLEN SMITH, APPLICANT) (Pursuant to Section 40 of the Supreme Court Act and Rule 25 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) APPLICANT (Respondent) RESPONDENT (Appellant) TAKE NOTICE that Ellen Smith hereby applies for leave to appeal to the Court, pursuant to sections 40 and 43 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:41 am
The Degree of Oversight and Enforcement is Key When Ireland faces sanctions under the European Convention on Human Rights, the Strasbourg Court can order the payment of costs and symbolic damages, and Ireland is subject to the political supervision of the Committee of Ministers in avoiding further avoiding (like in the A,B,C judgment). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
(C) EXCLUSIONS. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:05 am
" (§ 848(b)(1) – S7966). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where evidence was… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:16 am
Instead, litigants must rely upon the general protections set forth in Rule 26(b)(2)(C). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
The matter was remanded to the trial court for clarification of the basis for the amount of fees awarded. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Deborah C. [read post]
