Search for: "NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by LaToya Powell
The post Juvenile Code Reform Legislation (HB 879) Becomes Effective December 1, 2015 appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
North Carolina leads the way, once again, with the Eyewitness Identification Reform Act, which does just that. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
LeFlouri, an assistant professor of history at Florida Atlantic University, has published Chained in Silence: Black Women and Convict Labor in the New South, with the University of North Carolina Press: In 1868, the state of Georgia began to make its rapidly growing population of prisoners available for hire. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Federal judge slams criminal justice system, lauds North Carolina. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:06 am by Walter Olson
Readers who follow the battles over forfeiture law may recall the recent case in which a North Carolina convenience store owner from whom the government had seized $107,000 without any showing of wrongdoing decided to fight the case in the press as well as in court, backed by the Institute for Justice. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm by Jarod Bona
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm by Jarod Bona
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm by Jarod Bona
In fact, after the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Smith, a law professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, on July 1 on the website Slate.com. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:44 pm by Marc Climaco
Henry McCollum was convicted and sentenced to death in North Carolina for the murder and rape of a young girl. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a ruling out of the Middle District of North Carolina and upheld the summary judgment dismissal of an ADA lawsuit brought by the EEOC. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Mississippi, along with North Carolina, has preserved the tort of “alienation of affections,” which enables lawsuits by married persons against a spouse’s lover for undermining a marriage. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:44 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Related posts: North Carolina Cyber-Bullying Statute Survives First Amendment Challenge Revenge Porn/Cyberstalking Conviction Doesn’t Violate First Amendment–US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm by Einer Elhauge
We also saw the same divide in recent cases like North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The North Carolina statute prohibits: [the use of a computer network to] post or encourage others to post on the internet private, personal or sexual information pertaining to a minor [with] the intent to intimidate or torment a minor. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:22 am by Shari Shapiro
North Carolina is another example, where the codes are now on a 6 year cycle, and more legislation is in the works (HB255) to make adoption even more difficult. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:22 am by Shari Shapiro
North Carolina is another example, where the codes are now on a 6 year cycle, and more legislation is in the works (HB255) to make adoption even more difficult. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
It asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]