Search for: "P----D v. C----S"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 5,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling.Foundation is a 501(c)(3) corporation that opposes public employee unions and the Appellate Division's decision notes that "As part of its mission, it contacts represented public employees to inform them of their rights to opt out of union membership".An employee of Foundation had submitted a FOIL request [the "May request"] to DCAS. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling.Foundation is a 501(c)(3) corporation that opposes public employee unions and the Appellate Division's decision notes that "As part of its mission, it contacts represented public employees to inform them of their rights to opt out of union membership".An employee of Foundation had submitted a FOIL request [the "May request"] to DCAS. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
(c).) [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
Bell, Inc., No. 08–C–280, 2008 WL 4224360, at *11 (E.D.Wis. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
The Conseil d’État’s first referred question is whether the terminology of butchery, charcuterie and fish sectors is harmonised at Union level. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:07 am
¿Hacia dónde apuntan los nuevos emprendimientos culturales en el país? [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:29 am
Que, nunca más su compañero le pegue porqué usted le reclama dinero para alimentar a sus hijos y él no tiene para dárselo. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
In Aspen Skiing, D claimed that P’s mountain was lower quality, which made it unworthy of cooperation; its facilities were older/not quite as nice. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
The Kat's curiosity was rewarded -- but not in the way he'd hoped. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Johnny P. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
P. 11. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 8:23 am
¡¡¡Cómo sea!!!! [read post]
10 May 2016, 1:36 am
Quizás fue algo que se omitió involuntariamente y haya oportunidad de enmendarlo cuando el proyecto pase ahora a la Cámara de Representantes”, agregó. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 11:50 am
(S Rept No. 99-313 (PL 99-514) p. 735) In Mattie K. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Association canadienne pour les armes à feu c. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Robins Co., 577 P.2d 975, 979 (Wash. 1978); Banner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Stat. 14-2-102 (2001) (c), (d) and (e) conclusively dictate the result in this case. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:00 pm
Es más que válido el cuestionamiento de si, en efecto, hay una atención individualizada que ponga en contexto la necesidad particular de cada recluso. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:24 pm
When deciding a proper sanction, a court generally must consider, in light of the full record of the case, (a) willfulness or bad faith on the part of the noncompliant party; (b) the history, if any, of noncompliance; (c) the effectiveness of lesser sanctions; (d) whether the noncompliant party has been warned about the possibility of sanctions; (e) the client's complicity; and (f) prejudice to the moving party. [read post]
