Search for: "People v Goode" Results 2121 - 2140 of 22,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
 While deeply passionate people are kvelling over the Supreme Court’s 7-1 opinion in Foster v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
”  In addition to the substantive information it conveys, a good rebuttal case carries with it the subtext that the defense has attempted to pull a fast one and cannot be trusted. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
Given that in many employment environments diverse groups of people function together well, from banks to shops to universities to the governments of more liberal states, good luck with that. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Pulat Yunusov
The recent royal visit offers a good chance to talk about monarchy in Canada. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:42 pm
Under the case of People v Garza (35 Cal. 4th 866), this person can be charged with both Receiving Stolen Property and California automobile theft under Vehicle Code 10851. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
”  Shortly after taking office President Trump made good on that promise, mandating “development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures” and processes to “ensur[e] the proper collection of all information necessary for a rigorous evaluation of all grounds of inadmissibility. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm by Earl Drott
While the size of tractor trailers makes them efficient for hauling goods, it also creates substantial risks for other people on the road, as collisions involving commercial trucks are frequently deadly. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Up front I want to thank Lenny Sienko (http://lennyesq.wordpress.com/) for putting me onto the case of People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by JB
Josh Blackman, James Phillips, and John Yoo argue that a federal mandate to wear masks to prevent the spread of coronavirus would be unconstitutional under NFIB v. [read post]