Search for: "People v. Li" Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Daphne Keller
For one thing, highly viral content can do more damage than content few people see. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
And the good and bad uses to which this tool can be applied are limited only by people’s imagination… In short, the Internet has become the new terrain on which ideas are shared and deeds are shaped. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Second, Estrada’s own allegations indicated that the powder she received was safe for her, given the absence of allegations about risk to her.The majority clarified that there was no conflict with its reading of Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
According to her the pluralism could allow it were generated among the people the potential for freedom and equality policy. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm by Stephen Wermiel
United States, and giving defendants access to law enforcement reports in Jencks v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [read post]