Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Smith trips but is unharmed; however he is delayed by the stumble and therefore steps outside just as a gargoyle detaches from the building and falls on him. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd,… [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by Sean Hanover
Smith, discusses the immutable aspect of gang membership. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
In a dissent, Judge Smith argued that there was in fact no jurisdiction to hear this case, as there could be no final judgment without conviction and imposition of a sentence. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Earlier, the governor of the Luhansk region, Serhiy Haidai, said 90 people had been sheltering in the building in Bilohorivka, and 30 were rescued. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court notes that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of the commission of a specific crime is sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest as also ruled in People v Lee, Kramer v City of New York and People v Gonzalez. [read post]