Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 178,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2011, 4:48 pm
[via Google's $900 Million Hedge vs. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:35 am
The defendant did not see the plaintiff’s vehicle, however, and collided with the side of it. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Here, the District Court found that each plaintiff alleged injury from the same product, and each plaintiff’s claim involved the same allegedly wrongful conduct with regard to development, distribution, marketing, and sales practice for that product. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:57 pm
The plaintiff further alleged that the doctor’s deceiving statements regarding the full extent and cause of the injury had delayed his discovery of the doctor’s potential negligence. [read post]
25 May 2017, 12:31 pm
The court also stated there had not been evidence that the violation of the statute caused the plaintiff’s heart attack. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
Insomuch as the witness’s testimony may be necessary to the plaintiff’s case, an expert’s fee is usually money well-spent. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:49 am
After being informed that he had been awarded a spot on Lawdragon’s list, Mr. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 9:39 am
However, due to an admitted lapse on the plaintiff’s attorney’s part, the affidavit was not filed. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
City of Sanford, the court ultimately dismissed the case because the plaintiff failed to comply with the state’s Tort Claims Act. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:26 pm
The appeals court concluded that although the decision to bar the plaintiff’s expert had a significant harmful effect, the factors provided by the Maryland Rules pointed towards sanctioning the plaintiff. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Therefore, the plaintiff's reliance upon the unsigned form to create a genuine issue of facts is misplaced. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:06 am
Kia Motors of America, the appellate court affirmed the lower court’s decision that the plaintiffs’ experts were unreliable, and thus their testimony was inadmissible. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:36 am
With respect to plaintiff’s 90/180 claim, defendants rely on the testimony of the plaintiff which indicates there was virtually no diminution in the plaintiff’s ability to work. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:58 pm
In a September 19, 2018 malpractice case, the defendant appealed the jury’s verdict and award of $250,000 in damages in favor of the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff's driver's license was revoked by the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles [DMV] based on a 24-year-old default conviction for driving without insurance.* Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's CPLR Article 78 petition to stay the enforcement of the one-year revocation of Plaintiff's license by DMV. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Plaintiff's driver's license was revoked by the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles [DMV] based on a 24-year-old default conviction for driving without insurance.* Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiff's CPLR Article 78 petition to stay the enforcement of the one-year revocation of Plaintiff's license by DMV. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
The Plaintiff's case lasted about 10 days, and it is unlikely that the judge will find any significant errors in that presentation of evidence sufficient to take the case from the hands of the jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
Here’s the abstract: When cities are involved in litigation, it is most often as defendants. [read post]
