Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 2121 - 2140 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2024, 11:52 am by Bruce Zagaris
Bergman suggested that Red Notices on hostage-holders could be beneficial but risky in terms of deterrence. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am by Gustav L. Schmidt
Under the DGCL, stockholders entitled to vote in the election of directors have the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws; provided, however, that any corporation may, in its certificate of incorporation, confer the power to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws upon the directors. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm by Richard Hasen
Lines typically are drawn to favor the political party in power and to protect incumbents. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:30 am by Barry Sookman
AEREO, INC., Dis… http://t.co/EAb0VycOM5 -> India opposed to controls over Internet for cybersecurity http://t.co/8M3PLWCX2D -> Enforcing Injunctions: Perhaps Not so Powerful http://t.co/mmaHVDkD7j -> Secret court argues (again) that it’s not a rubber stamp for surveillance http://t.co/VjJI9tLi6p -> Misquoting Prosser: Volition and Fox Broadcasting v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
Openly, the dilution, removal, or expulsion powers are spelled out explicitly in the operating agreement signed by all the members. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Chief Justice John Marshall famously wrote in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
(See for example, MDG Computers Canada Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am by Josh H. Escovedo
While they aren’t as powerful and expansive as the rights provided to holders of federally registered trademarks under the Lanham Act, state registration and trademark laws provide the trademark user with reasonably adequate protections. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
It’s not an understatement to say that the NTP v. [read post]