Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 55,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2007, 4:30 am
In Franklin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:42 am
In Brantley v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: SWC, LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel and another [2008] EWHC 1688 (QB), Court of Appeal November 25, 2008. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
The newest installments comment on the Supreme Court’s June decision in American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 12:03 am
Through these years, Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:25 am
Wisc.) praised the result, stating that private property rights need to be protected from improper government seizure, citing the case of Kelo v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 11:04 am
In Cero v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 7:44 pm
Beginning with the parsons case, this has been interpreted as containing 2 branches: power over international or interprovincial trade and commerce, and a second branch of power over general trade affecting the dominion as a whole. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:37 am
The Commission sought to permanently bar Powers from participating in penny stock offerings, but the court concluded that an injunction against such participation that was already in place was sufficient (SEC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 pm
Leocal v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:11 pm
LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:41 pm
During a power outage, plaintiffs’ vehicle entered the dark intersection and was struck by another car. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome… [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
For the first time in its history, the Court held federal legislation based upon the spending power to be unconstitutionally coercive. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:47 am
On April 16, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Genesis HealthCare Corp v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:04 am
Hot off the presses, the Supreme Court just issued its decision in Vance v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 1:17 pm
On October 29, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Clapper v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 am
<> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
But what the Supreme Court did in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
