Search for: "President v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 22,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:33 am
Supreme Court Decision Google LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
In my latest FindLaw column, I pile on the Obama Justice Department for its wretched brief in Smelt v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 26, 1902. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 922 (1997). [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
The Court of Appeals decision June 30th (see ILB entry here) in the case of Indiana Department of Natural Resources and State of Indiana v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Roig v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
” In Marbury v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
The most recent lawyer-president to do so was Richard Nixon when he argued the case of Time v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:32 am
If the President, for example, placed a permanent cross in the White House without using funds earmarked by Congress, it is unlikely anyone would have standing to challenge that decision Hein also reaffirms the seminal taxpayer standing case, Flast v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
This lawsuit was Galper v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:07 pm
For example, during three of his previous lawsuits against Siemens, Pittman had filed five motions to disqualify the presiding judges. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:52 pm
Coffeen III Mgmt., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See Bassett v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:26 am
The opinion of Judge Michael Malihi of Georgia's Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH), issued on February 3, is essentially correct, because the claim was not properly framed. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
